Mishneh Torah — The Chosen Temple (Beit HaBechirah) הלכות בית הבחירה, Chapter 4

אֶבֶן הָיְתָה בְּקֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים בְּמַעֲרָבוֹ שֶׁעָלֶיהָ הָיָה הָאָרוֹן מֻנָּח. וּלְפָנָיו צִנְצֶנֶת הַמָּן וּמַטֵּה אַהֲרֹן. וּבְעֵת שֶׁבָּנָה שְׁלֹמֹה אֶת הַבַּיִת וְיָדַע שֶׁסּוֹפוֹ לֵחָרֵב בָּנָה בּוֹ מָקוֹם לִגְנֹז בּוֹ הָאָרוֹן לְמַטָּה בְּמַטְמוֹנִיּוֹת עֲמֻקוֹת וַעֲקַלְקַלּוֹת וְיֹאשִׁיָּהוּ הַמֶּלֶךְ צִוָּה וּגְנָזוֹ בַּמָּקוֹם שֶׁבָּנָה שְׁלֹמֹה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברי הימים ב לה ג) "וַיֹּאמֶר לַלְוִיִּם הַמְּבִינִים לְכָל יִשְׂרָאֵל הַקְּדוֹשִׁים לַה' תְּנוּ אֶת אֲרוֹן הַקֹּדֶשׁ בַּבַּיִת אֲשֶׁר בָּנָה שְׁלֹמֹה בֶן דָּוִיד מֶלֶךְ יִשְׂרָאֵל אֵין לָכֶם מַשָּׂא בַּכָּתֵף עַתָּה עִבְדוּ אֶת ה' אֱלֹהֵיכֶם" וְגוֹ'. וְנִגְנַז עִמּוֹ מַטֵּה אַהֲרֹן וְהַצִּנְצֶנֶת וְשֶׁמֶן הַמִּשְׁחָה וְכָל אֵלּוּ לֹא חָזְרוּ בְּבַיִת שֵׁנִי. וְאַף אוּרִים וְתֻמִּים שֶׁהָיוּ בְּבַיִת שֵׁנִי לֹא הָיוּ מְשִׁיבִין בְּרוּחַ הַקֹּדֶשׁ. וְלֹא הָיוּ נִשְׁאָלִין בָּהֶן שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (עזרא ב סג) (נחמיה ז סה) "עַד עֲמֹד כֹּהֵן לְאוּרִים וְתֻמִּים". וְלֹא הָיוּ עוֹשִׂין אוֹתָן אֶלָּא לְהַשְׁלִים שְׁמוֹנָה בְּגָדִים לְכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יְהֵא מְחֻסַּר בְּגָדִים:

The Ark was placed on a stone 53b refers to that stone as the even hashtiah, "the foundation stone", and explains that it was given that name because it was the foundation upon which God fashioned the world. According to certain views, the Dome of the Rock Mosque is located on the Temple site and the stone around which it is built is the same even hashtiah. Other Rabbinical sources, however, do not accept this claim. in the western portion of the Holy of Holies. 6:2) states that the Ark was placed in the center of the Holy of Holies. A similar statement is also found in the Midrash Tanchuma (Parshat Kedoshim, sec. 10). However, the latter source states that the Even HaShtiah was placed behind the Ark. Perhaps the resolution is that stone was large. It began in the center of the Holy of Holies, while the ark was placed in its western portion. The vial of manna of manna. Place it before the Lord as a testimonial for your descendants. "Commenting on that verse, Rashi relates that in the time of Jeremiah, the people rationalized the fact that they did not study Torah, because of the pressures they faced in earning a livelihood. Jeremiah took the vial of manna from before the Ark and exclaimed: "See how God sustained your ancestors for forty years! Do you doubt whether He can sustain you today?" and Aharon's staff were placed before it.When Solomon built the Temple, he was aware that it would ultimately be destroyed. [Therefore,] he constructed a chamber, in which the ark could be entombed below [the Temple building] in deep, maze-like vaults.King Josiah commanded that [the Ark] be entombed in the chamber built by Solomon, as it is said (II Chronicles 35:3 : "And he said to the Levites who would teach wisdom to all of Israel: 'Place the Holy Ark in the chamber built by Solomon, the son of David, King of Israel. You will no [longer] carry it on your shoulders. Now, serve the Lord, your God.' 53b) and the Tosafta (Sotah 13:2). Although some Sages agree that the Ark was entombed as explained above, others maintain that it was one of the sacred articles plundered by the Babylonian conquerors. A third opinion agrees that it was entombed, but argues that it was entombed under the Chamber of Wood in the Woman's Courtyard and not under the Holy of Holies.When it was entombed, Aharon's staff, the vial of manna, and the oil used for anointing were entombed with it. All these [sacred articles] did not return in the Second Temple.Similarly, the Urim V'Tumim that existed in the Second Temple did not answer with Ruach HaKodesh (Divine inspiration) 73b and the commentaries (Nachmanides and Rabbenu Bachai on Numbers 28:21 explain that the Urim V'Tumim were consulted as oracles by the High Priest. They provided guidance on all important questions involving the people as a whole. See the conclusion of Hilchot K'lei HaMikdash for a discussion of this issue. and questions were not asked of them, as stated [in Ezra 2:63]: "until a priest will arise with the Urim V'Tumim." 21b mentions the Urim V'Tumim as one of the five miraculous aspects of the First Temple service, which were lacking in the Second Temple. The Rambam quotes that statement in Hilchot K'lei HaMikdash 10:10.Nevertheless, they were not completely lacking. Exodus 28:43 commands the priests to wear all of the garments prescribed for them during their service in the Sanctuary. If even one garment was lacking, they would be punished by death. Thus, the High Priest had to wear the breastplate with the stones, the Urim V'Tumim. Otherwise, he would lack one of the eight garments he was required to wear. The Rambam explains that although the stones were embedded in the breastplate in the Second Temple as well, they lacked the spiritual dimension that they had possessed in the First Temple. [In the Second Temple,] they only made them to fulfill the requirement of eight garments for the High Priest., ch. 8. Thus, the High Priest would not lack one of the required garments.. He interprets the Urim V'Tumim as being mystical names of God engraved on the breastplate, rather than the stones themselves.In his Chiddushim, Rav Yaakov Emden questions the reason for including this Halachah: "On the surface, there is apparently no practical relevance to these matters in our behavior....The Rambam generally does not include aspects which have neither Halachic nor ethical significance in this text." Why then is it important for us to know whether or not the ark was entombed and where it was entombed?Rav Emden then explains the question he posed, based on the Rambam's statements in Chapter 6. There, the Rambam stated that after the exile, the sanctity of Eretz Yisrael was nullified regarding the laws of the Sabbatical year, the tithes, and certain other agricultural rulings. However, the holiness of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount always remained intact because:The holiness of the Temple and Jerusalem comes about because of the Shechinah, and the Shechinah can never be nullified. Behold, God declared (Leviticus 27:31 : "I shall destroy your Sanctuaries." and the Sages commented (Megillah 28a): "Even though they are destroyed, their holiness remains intact. "The Shechinah's resting place was the Ark. Therefore, had the Ark not been "entombed...in deep, maze-like vaults," on the Temple Mount, the sanctity of that site would also have been nullified. See also Chatam Sofer, Chullin 7a.Likkutei Sichot (Vol. 21, p. 156-160) also discusses the same question. It explains that the Ark is a fundamental element of the Temple and the Temple building cannot be complete without it.Therefore, from the very beginning of the Temple's construction, the Ark had two locations:a) the place for the ark in the Holy of Holies,b) the hidden vault where the Ark would be kept in the event of the Temple's destruction.On this basis, we can see the Sanctuary built by Moses, the two Temples in Jerusalem, and the Messianic Temple, as unified by one essential bond. Since the same Ark was present in all previous structures and they will be revealed again in the Messianic age, all four buildings share the same essence.

בְּבַיִת רִאשׁוֹן הָיָה כֹּתֶל מַבְדִּיל בֵּין הַקֹּדֶשׁ וּבֵין קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים עָבְיוֹ אַמָּה. וְכֵיוָן שֶׁבָּנוּ הַבַּיִת שֵׁנִי נִסְתַּפֵּק לָהֶם אִם עֳבִי הַכֹּתֶל הָיָה מִמִּדַּת הַקֹּדֶשׁ אוֹ מִמִּדַּת קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים לְפִיכָךְ עָשׂוּ קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים עָבְיוֹ עֶשְׂרִים אַמָּה תְּמִימוֹת וְעָשׂוּ הַקֹּדֶשׁ אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה תְּמִימוֹת וְהִנִּיחוּ אַמָּה יְתֵרָה בֵּין הַקֹּדֶשׁ וּבֵין קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים וְלֹא בָּנוּ כֹּתֶל בְּבַיִת שֵׁנִי אֶלָּא עָשׂוּ שְׁתֵּי פָּרוֹכוֹת אַחַת מִצַּד קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים וְאַחַת מִצַּד הַקֹּדֶשׁ וּבֵינֵיהֶן אַמָּה כְּנֶגֶד עֳבִי הַכֹּתֶל שֶׁהָיָה בָּרִאשׁוֹן. אֲבָל בְּמִקְדָּשׁ רִאשׁוֹן לֹא הָיְתָה שָׁם אֶלָּא פָרֹכֶת אַחַת בִּלְבַד שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כו לג) "וְהִבְדִּילָה הַפָּרֹכֶת לָכֶם" וְגוֹ':

The First Temple had a one-cubit thick wall which separated the Sanctuary and the Holy of Holies., alone served this function. In the First Temple, a wall was also built in addition to the curtain. When the Second Temple was constructed, they were unsure whether the width of that wall was included in the measure of the Sanctuary or the Holy of Holies.:17, 20): "The Sanctuary was 40 cubits long...and the space for the ark was 20 cubits long." Since the combined length of both chambers was only 60 cubits, the width of the wall had to be included in the measure of one of the chambers. However, it was not clear from which chamber it should be built (Jerusalem Talmud, Kelayim 8:4; see also Yoma 52a for a slightly different explanation). Therefore, the Holy of Holies was made a full twenty cubits long, and the Sanctuary a full forty cubits long, and one additional cubit was left between the Sanctuary and the Holy of Holies. asks why the builders of the Second Temple were willing to add an extra cubit between the two chambers, when they hesitated to increase the width of the dividing wall. In resolution, it is explained that originally the eastern wall built by Solomon was seven cubits thick, while in the Second Temple, it was only six cubits thick. Thus, there was no change in the total length of the Temple building.They did not build a wall in the Second Temple. 3a,b explains that they did not build a wall because the Second Temple was higher than the First. The First Temple was only 30 cubits high. The Second Temple was 100 cubits high. A wall only a cubit thick would not be sturdy if built to such a height. Nevertheless, the width of the wall was not increased, because its original width was established by Ruach HaKodesh, Divine revelation. Thus, they returned to the pattern established in the Sanctuary of Moses and utilized curtains as dividers. Rather, they hung two curtains, one from the side of the Sanctuary and one from the side of the Holy of Holies, with a cubit between them 52b relates that the external curtain had an opening on the south and the inner curtain had an opening on the north. Thus, to enter the Holy of Holies, the High Priest had to go through the entire width of the Temple between the two curtains. in place of the width of the wall of the First [Temple]. (Yoma, ibid.) asks why they were not able to resolve their dilemma by hanging one curtain, a cubit in width.In response, the commentary states that both curtains were necessary because the verse quoted above, "the curtain shall divide..." clearly implies that the sanctity of the Holy of Holies begins with the outer surface of the curtain. Thus, based on the possibility that the wall of the First Temple was included within the 20 cubits of the Holy of Holies, an additional cubit would have been included in this sacred area if only one curtain was used. From this perspective, the inner curtain had to be a distinct entity, marking the beginning of the most sacred chamber.Conversely, based on the view that the wall had been included in the measure of the Sanctuary and that the wall and the Holy of Holies encompassed 21 cubits, a thick curtain would have been unnecessary, since the outer curtain was located where the division was required to be made. However, in the First Temple, there was only one curtain, explains that the expression "First Temple" refers to the Sanctuary, for the First Temple itself had a wall rather than a curtain. However, Rav Yaakov Emden disputes this issue, quoting Yoma 54a which brings a number of Aggadot concerning the Ark and the curtain in the First Temple. The Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (Middot 4:7) specifically states that there was a curtain in addition to the wall in the First Temple. as [Exodus 26:33] states: "The curtain will divide for you [between the Sanctuary and the Holy of Holies.]"

הַהֵיכָל שֶׁבָּנוּ בְּנֵי גּוֹלָה הָיָה מֵאָה אַמָּה עַל מֵאָה אַמָּה עַל רוּם מֵאָה. וְכֵן הָיְתָה מִדַּת רוּמוֹ. בָּנוּ גֹּבַהּ שֵׁשׁ אַמּוֹת אָטוּם סָתוּם כְּמוֹ יְסוֹד לוֹ. וְרוּם כָּתְלֵי הַבַּיִת אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה וְרוּם הַכִּיּוּר שֶׁבַּתִּקְרָה אַמָּה וְעַל גַּבָּיו גֹּבַהּ שְׁתֵּי אַמּוֹת פָּנוּי שֶׁיִּכָּנֵס בּוֹ הַדֶּלֶף וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא בֵּית דִּילְפָא. וָעֳבִי הַתִּקְרָה שֶׁעַל גַּבֵּי בֵּית דִּילְפָא אַמָּה. וּמַעֲזִיבָה גֹּבַהּ אַמָּה. וַעֲלִיָּה בְּנוּיָה עַל גַּבָּיו גֹּבַהּ כְּתָלֶיהָ אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה. וּבְגַגָּהּ גֹּבַהּ אַמָּה כִּיּוּר וְאַמָּתַיִם גֹּבַהּ בֵּית דִּילְפָא וְאַמָּה תִּקְרָה וְאַמָּה מַעֲזִיבָה וְגֹבַהּ הַמַּעֲקֶה שָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת וְטַס שֶׁל בַּרְזֶל כְּמוֹ סַיִף גָּבְהוֹ אַמָּה עַל גַּבֵּי הַמַּעֲקֶה סָבִיב כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יָנוּחוּ עָלָיו הָעוֹפוֹת וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא כָּלֶה עוֹרֵב. הֲרֵי הַכּל מֵאָה אַמָּה:

The Temple building constructed by the exiles [returning from Babylon] was one hundred cubits long, one hundred cubits wide, and one hundred cubits high. The measurement of its height can be described as follows: 4:6.They built a solid base six cubits high resembling a foundation for it; explains that the addition of the word "resembling" in this halachah might imply that the Rambam changed his mind and adopted an interpretation similar to that of Rabbenu Shemaya.Tosafot Yom Tov objects to the Rambam's commentary on the Mishnah, explaining that it would be inappropriate to include the measure of this base in the height of the Temple. He also explains that in the Mishneh Torah, the Rambam adopted a different perspective. He thus, defines the base as an extension of the steps leading to the Entrance Hall. These steps were six cubits high, the height of the base.Tzurat HaBayit relates that there was a functional aspect to the base, and explains that it contained the lowest floor of the cells mentioned in Halachah 10.the Sanctuary, 40 cubits high;an ornate ceiling, one cubit high;above that, two cubits were left empty to allow dripping [water] to collect [and to be drained off]; this was called the Beit Dilpa;the roof above the Beit Dilpa was a cubit thick;the plaster, a cubit high;an upper storey was built on it; its walls were 40 cubits high;its roof included an ornate ceiling one cubit high;a Beit Dilpa, two cubits high;a roof, one cubit high;plaster, one cubit high;a guard rail, three cubits high; 136a), a guard rail was constructed for the Sanctuary.a sheet of iron resembling a blade, a cubit high, was placed all around the guard rail so that birds will not rest upon it. It was called the Kaleh Orev.The total of the above is 100 cubits.

מִן הַמַּעֲרָב לַמִּזְרָח מֵאָה אַמָּה וְזֶהוּ חֶשְׁבּוֹנָן. אַרְבָּעָה כְּתָלִים זֶה לְפָנִים מִזֶּה וּבֵינֵיהֶן שְׁלֹשָׁה מְקוֹמוֹת פְּנוּיִין. בֵּין הַכֹּתֶל הַמַּעֲרָבִי וּבֵין הַכֹּתֶל שֶׁלְּפָנִים מִמֶּנּוּ חָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת וּבֵין כֹּתֶל שֵׁנִי וּשְׁלִישִׁי שֵׁשׁ אַמּוֹת וּבֵין כֹּתֶל שְׁלִישִׁי וּרְבִיעִי שֵׁשׁ אַמּוֹת. וְאֵלּוּ הַמִּדּוֹת הֵן שֶׁל עֳבִי הַכֹּתֶל עִם הַמָּקוֹם הַפָּנוּי שֶׁבֵּין שְׁנֵי כְּתָלִים. וְאֹרֶךְ קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים עֶשְׂרִים אַמָּה. וּבֵין שְׁתֵּי הַפָּרוֹכוֹת הַמַּבְדִּילוֹת בֵּינוֹ וּבֵין הַקֹּדֶשׁ אַמָּה. וְאֹרֶךְ הַקֹּדֶשׁ אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה. וָעֳבִי הַכֹּתֶל הַמִּזְרָחִי שֶׁבּוֹ הַשַּׁעַר שֵׁשׁ אַמּוֹת וְהָאוּלָם אַחַת עֶשְׂרֵה אַמָּה. וָעֳבִי כֹּתֶל הָאוּלָם חָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת. נִמְצָא הַכּל מֵאָה אַמָּה:

From the west to the east, there were 100 cubits as follows: 4:7. However, his interpretation of the Mishnah varies from the literal meaning.The Mishnah relates all the measurements from the wall of the Entrance Hall, the easternmost point of the Temple building, until the end of the Holy of Holies. Afterwards, it continues: "The wall of the Temple was six [cubits], the cell was six [cubits], and the wall of the cell was five [cubits]."In his Commentary to the Mishnah (Middot 4:3), the Rambam explains that unlike the northern, southern, and eastern external walls of the Temple, the two walls mentioned in the above Mishnah were not solid. Rather, each wall mentioned by the Mishnah refers to two walls, each a cubit thick, with a vacant space in between. Thus, there were really four walls, with three vacant spaces between. The vacant spaces are called cells, ta'im, in Hebrew and discussed in Halachah 10. In particular, the measurements of these vacant spaces are slightly different, as the Rambam explains.There were four walls, one within the other, with three vacant spaces between them:Between the western wall and the wall inside of it, five cubits,Between the second and third walls, six cubits,Between the third and fourth walls, six cubits.These measurements include the width of the wall and the space between it and the following wall.The length of the Holy of Holies was 20 cubits.Between the two curtains separating the Holy of Holies and the Sanctuary, one cubit.The length of the Sanctuary was 40 cubits.The width of the eastern wall in which the entrance was positioned was six cubits.The Entrance Hall was eleven cubits [long].The wall of the Entrance Hall was five cubits thick.Thus, the total is 100 cubits.

מִן הַצָּפוֹן לַדָּרוֹם מֵאָה אַמָּה. עֳבִי כֹּתֶל הָאוּלָם חָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת. וּמִכֹּתֶל אוּלָם עַד כֹּתֶל הַקֹּדֶשׁ עֶשֶׂר אַמּוֹת. וְכָתְלֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ שִׁשָּׁה כְּתָלִים זֶה לְפָנִים מִזֶּה וּבֵינֵיהֶן חֲמִשָּׁה מְקוֹמוֹת פְּנוּיִין. בֵּין כֹּתֶל חִיצוֹן וּבֵין הַשֵּׁנִי חָמֵשׁ אַמּוֹת. וּבֵין שֵׁנִי וּשְׁלִישִׁי שָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת. וְחָמֵשׁ בֵּין שְׁלִישִׁי וּרְבִיעִי. וּבֵין רְבִיעִי וַחֲמִישִׁי שֵׁשׁ. וּבֵין חֲמִישִׁי וְכֹתֶל הַפְּנִימִי שֵׁשׁ. נִמְצָא הַכּל אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה מִצַּד זֶה וְאַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה מִצַּד שֶׁכְּנֶגְדוֹ וְרֹחַב הַבַּיִת מִבִּפְנִים עֶשְׂרִים. הֲרֵי מֵאָה אַמָּה:

From north to south, there were 100 cubits: 4:7) cited in the previous Halachah. In this Halachah as well, the Rambam does not follow a perfectly literal rendition of the Mishnah.The width of the wall of the Entrance Hall was five cubits.There were ten cubits from the wall of the Entrance Hall until the wall of the Sanctuary.The Sanctuary had six walls, one within the other, with five vacant places between them:Between the outer wall and the second [wall], there were five cubits;Between the second and the third, three cubits;).Between the third and the fourth, five;Between the fourth and the fifth, six; andBetween the fifth and the sixth, six.Thus, these [walls and chambers encompassed] a total of forty cubits on both sides [of the Temple building.] The width of the Temple inside was 20 cubits.The total was 100 cubits.

הַפִּשְׁפָּשׁ וְהוּא שַׁעַר הַקָּטָן. וּשְׁנֵי פִּשְׁפָּשִׁין הָיוּ לַהֵיכָל מִצִּדֵּי הַשַּׁעַר הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁבְּאֶמְצַע. אֶחָד בַּצָּפוֹן וְאֶחָד בַּדָּרוֹם. שֶׁבַּדָּרוֹם לֹא נִכְנַס בּוֹ אָדָם מֵעוֹלָם וְעָלָיו הוּא מְפֹרָשׁ עַל יְדֵי יְחֶזְקֵאל (יחזקאל מד ב) "הַשַּׁעַר הַזֶּה סָגוּר יִהְיֶה לֹא יִפָּתֵחַ". וְשֶׁבַּצָּפוֹן בּוֹ נִכְנָסִין. וּמְהַלֵּךְ בֵּין שֵׁנִי הַכְּתָלִים עַד שֶׁמַּגִּיעַ לְמָקוֹם פָּתוּחַ לַקֹּדֶשׁ מִשְּׂמֹאלוֹ וְנִכְנָס לְתוֹךְ הַהֵיכָל וּמְהַלֵּךְ עַד שַׁעַר הַגָּדוֹל וּפוֹתְחוֹ:

A wicket is a small gateway. The Sanctuary had two wickets on the sides of the great gate in the middle, one on the north and one on the south.No one ever entered through the southern [wicket]. Explicit [reference] to this [is made] by [in the Book of] Ezekiel [44:2]: "This gate will be closed. It will not be opened." explains that this is an expression of God's humility. Rather than enter through the "great gate," God chooses to approach the Sanctuary through the modest wicket.[Every morning, the priests] would enter [through the wicket] on the north and proceed between the two walls until reaching an opening to the Sanctuary on the left. [From there], they would enter the Temple, proceed to the great gate, and open it. 4:2 and explains the manner in which the gates to the Sanctuary were opened each morning. Rather than open them from the front, the priests came in through the Entrance Hall, turned to the right, and entered through the wicket. They continued walking between the walls until reaching an opening from which they could enter the Sanctuary.According to a diagram that accompanies Rav Kapach's edition of the Rambam's Commentary on the Mishnah, the entrance to the Sanctuary was approximately in the center of the Sanctuary.

הַשַּׁעַר הַגָּדוֹל הָיָה רָחְבּוֹ עֶשֶׂר אַמּוֹת וְגָבְהוֹ עֶשְׂרִים אַמָּה. וְאַרְבַּע דַּלְתוֹת הָיוּ לוֹ שְׁתַּיִם בִּפְנִים וּשְׁתַּיִם בַּחוּץ. הַחִיצוֹנוֹת נִפְתָּחוֹת לְתוֹךְ הַפֶּתַח לְכַסּוֹת עָבְיוֹ שֶׁל כֹּתֶל וְהַפְּנִימִיּוֹת נִפְתָּחוֹת לְתוֹךְ הַבַּיִת לְכַסּוֹת אֲחוֹרֵי הַדְּלָתוֹת:

The great gate (Tosafot Yom Tov). was ten cubits wide and twenty cubits high. 2:3). It had four doors: two to the inner [chamber,] and two to the outside. The outer gates opened into the doorway, covering the breadth of the walls.). See the accompanying drawing. The inner [gates] opened into the Sanctuary, covering the [wall space] behind the doors. 4:1, which is the source for this halachah, continues: "The entire Temple was plated with gold except for the space behind the doors." Thus, when the doors were opened, they were folded against the wall and they covered that space with gold as well.

פִּתְחוֹ שֶׁל אוּלָם הָיָה גָּבוֹהַּ אַרְבָּעִים אַמָּה וְרֹחַב עֶשְׂרִים. וְלֹא הָיָה לוֹ שְׁעָרִים. וְחָמֵשׁ מַלְתְּרִיּוֹת שֶׁל מִילָא הָיוּ עַל גַּבֵּי פִּתְחוֹ מִלְּמַעְלָה. הַתַּחְתּוֹנָה עוֹדֶפֶת עַל הַפֶּתַח אַמָּה מִזֶּה וְאַמָּה מִזֶּה. וְכָל אַחַת מֵחֲמִשְׁתָּן עוֹדֶפֶת עַל שֶׁלְּמַטָּה מִמֶּנָּה אַמָּה מִזֶּה וְאַמָּה מִזֶּה. נִמְצֵאת הָעֶלְיוֹנָה שְׁלֹשִׁים אַמָּה. וְנִדְבָּךְ שֶׁל אֲבָנִים הָיָה בֵּין כָּל אַחַת וְאַחַת:

The opening to the Entrance Hall was forty cubits high and twenty [cubits] wide. It did not have gates. 7:17, there was a curtain covering this entrance.Five oak beams 3:7), the Rambam notes that attractive designs and forms were carved into these beams. were [positioned] above this entrance. notes this apparent contradiction and explains that these beams were embedded into the wall and were thus, not "protruding." The bottom [beam] extended beyond the entrance, one cubit on either side. Each of the five [beams] extended one cubit on either side of the [beam] below it. Thus, the uppermost beam was thirty cubits [long]. There was a tier of stones between each beam.

הַהֵיכָל הָיָה בִּנְיָנוֹ רָחָב מִלְּפָנָיו וְצַר מֵאֲחוֹרָיו כְּמוֹ אֲרִי. וִיצִיעִים הָיוּ מַקִּיפִין לַבַּיִת כֻּלּוֹ מִסָּבִיב חוּץ לְכֹתֶל הַמְּסִבָּה. וְיָצִיעַ הַתַּחְתּוֹנָה חָמֵשׁ וְרֹבֶד עַל גַּבָּהּ שֵׁשׁ וְיָצִיעַ אֶמְצָעִית שֵׁשׁ וְרֹבֶד עַל גַּבָּהּ שֶׁבַע וְהָעֶלְיוֹנָה שֶׁבַע שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (מלכים א ו ו) "הַיָּצִיעַ הַתַּחְתֹּנָה" וְגוֹ'. וְכֵן הָיוּ הַשָּׁלֹשׁ יְצִיעִים מַקִּיפִים לַבַּיִת מִשְּׁלֹשָׁה רוּחוֹתָיו וְכֵן סָבִיב לְכָתְלֵי הָאוּלָם מִלְּמַטָּה עַד לְמַעְלָה כָּךְ הָיוּ אַמָּה אַחַת חָלָק וְרֹבֶד שָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת. וְאַמָּה חָלָק וְרֹבֶד שָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת עַד לְמַעְלָה. וְנִמְצְאוּ הָרְבָדִין מֻקָּפִין לַכְּתָלִים. רֹחַב כָּל רֹבֶד שָׁלֹשׁ אַמּוֹת עַד לְמַעְלָה. וּבֵין כָּל רֹבֶד וְרֹבֶד אַמָּה. וְרֹבֶד הָעֶלְיוֹן הָיָה רָחְבּוֹ אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת:

The structure of the Temple was wide in its front and narrow in its rear, like a lion. Balconies 4:4. However, the Rambam's conception of these structures differs from that of other commentaries and has been the subject of much debate. [extended] from the wall of the winding stairwell and surrounded the Temple on all sides. The lowest balcony was five [cubits long.] The pavement above it was six cubits long. The middle projection was six cubits, and the pavement above it seven cubits. The upper balcony was seven cubits, as it is said (I Kings 6:6 : "The lowest balcony...." Thus, three balconies surrounded the Temple from three sides. mentions the Rambam's opinion. However, the diagrams drawn by the Rambam himself and accompanying his Commentary to the Mishnah (as published in Rav Kapach's edition) were not at his disposal. Hence, there may be some imprecision in his interpretation of the Rambam's words.To understand the Rambam, we must return to the original sources. However, even that is not easy, since most available translations and even most commentaries in Hebrew follow Rashi's view.The following is a rendition of the verses in Kings, according to the Rambam:And on the walls of the House, he constructed a side-structure surrounding the walls of the House, the Sanctuary, and the Holy of Holies. He made projections around [the House]. The lowest structure was five cubits wide; the middle one, six cubits wide, and the third, seven cubits wide. He placed structures diminishing in size for the House, surrounding it on its exterior, so that [the people] will not take hold of the House.The Mishnah interprets those verses as follows:The lowest [balcony] was five [cubits wide - as mentioned in the verse]. There was a projection of six cubits [the projection mentioned in the verse.] The middle one was six cubits, and there was an additional projection of seven cubits. The upper one was seven cubits wide.The Rambam's diagrams show a straight outer wall of the Temple, and balconies which diminish in length on their outer side (in contrast to the explanation offered by the Tosafot Yom Tov).The balconies in the Rambam's drawings were built as a protective measure, to insure that the priests show proper respect for the Temple and do not lean against its walls.Similarly, [there were projections] from bottom to top, around the wall of the Entrance Hall. The [pattern] was as follows: 3:6 which states:There were 22 cubits between the Entrance Hall and the Altar. There were twelve steps there. Each step was half a cubit high and one cubit wide.A cubit, a cubit; and a protrusion of three; a cubit, a cubit, and a protrusion of three; on the highest level, a cubit, a cubit, and a protrusion of four.Rashi interprets the entire mishnah as referring to the steps leading to the Entrance Hall. In order to fill the space between the Altar and the Entrance Hall, platforms were inserted into the steps. Thus, there were three empty cubits before the first step, a step, a step, and a platform of three, etc. until one reached the Entrance Hall.Rav Kapach's translation of the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah sees the mishnah as referring to two separate subjects, the steps which had been mentioned previously and protrusions which he describes as follows:Afterwards, [the mishnah] states that the wall of the Entrance Hall was built in the following pattern. A cubit long portion of the wall was left vacant as all the other walls...Above it there was a structure protruding from the wall, three cubits high... called a projection. Similarly, the entire height [of the wall] ...had one cubit of [vacant] wall space, a projection of three cubits... until the uppermost projection, which was four cubits high.Note the accompanying drawing copied from Rav Kapach's edition of the Commentary to the Mishnah. Rather than picture the front wall of the Temple as a flat structure, the Rambam depicts it as being covered with these projections.one vacant cubit,a projection of three cubits,one vacant cubit, and then,a projection of three cubits.This pattern was followed until the top [of the wall.] Thus, the projections surrounded the walls. Each projection was three cubits wide until the top [of the wall], and between each projection was a [vacant] cubit. The uppermost projection was four cubits wide.

כָּל אֵלּוּ הַמְּקוֹמוֹת הַפְּנוּיִים שֶׁבֵּין הַכְּתָלִים הֵם הַנִּקְרָאִים תָּאִים. נִמְצְאוּ הַתָּאִים הַמֻּקָּפִין לַמִּקְדָּשׁ חֲמִשָּׁה מִן הַצָּפוֹן וַחֲמִשָּׁה מִן הַדָּרוֹם וּשְׁלֹשָׁה מִן הַמַּעֲרָב. וְשָׁלֹשׁ דְּיוֹטוֹת הָיוּ דְּיוֹטָא עַל גַּבֵּי דְּיוֹטָא. נִמְצְאוּ ט"ו תָּאִים בַּדָּרוֹם חֲמִשָּׁה עַל גַּבֵּי חֲמִשָּׁה וַחֲמִשָּׁה עַל גַּבֵּיהֶן וְכֵן בַּצָּפוֹן חֲמִשָּׁה עָשָׂר. וּשְׁמוֹנָה תָּאִים הָיוּ בַּמַּעֲרָב שְׁלֹשָׁה עַל גַּבֵּי שְׁלֹשָׁה וּשְׁנַיִם עַל גַּבֵּיהֶן בִּדְיוֹטָא אַחַת הַכּל ל"ח תָּאִים:

All the vacant spaces between the walls are called cells. 4:3 states:There were 38 cells: five in the north, five in the south, and eight in the west. In the north and in the south, there were five above five, with five above them. In the west, there were three above three, with two above them.Middot 4:7 states:The wall of the winding stairwell, five; the winding stairwell, three; the wall of the cell, five; the cell, six; the wall of the Sanctuary, six; the [Sanctuary's] enclosed area, twenty; the wall of the Sanctuary, six; the cell, six; the wall of the cell, six; the drainage chamber, three; and the [outer] wall, five.Rashi and the Ra'avad explain the two mishnayot simply: The chamber referred to as "the cell" in mishnah 4:7 was, in fact, divided lengthwise into five cells on the northern and southern sides of the Temple, with three cells on the western side. All the other specific dimensions mentioned by the mishnah can thus be understood without any difficulty.In contrast, the Rambam explains that the walls mentioned in the mishnah 4:7 were not solid, but rather, double walls, each a cubit in thickness, and with a hollow space in between. The five cells mentioned in 4:3 thus, refer to the five vacant spaces between the walls. These spaces extended the entire length of the Sanctuary and the Holy of Holies on the northern and southern sides, and the three cells extended to the three vacant spaces between the walls on the western side.Note the accompanying drawings copied from Rav Kapach's edition of the Commentary to the Mishnah. The three divisions must be seen as being placed one on top of the other. Thus, five cells surrounded the Sanctuary on the north, five on the south, and three on the west.There were three levels [of cells,] one level above the other. Thus, there were fifteen cells on the south; five above five, with five above them. Similarly, in the north, there were fifteen cells.There were eight cells in the west; three above three, with two above them on one level. Thus, there were a total of 38 cells.

שְׁלֹשָׁה פְּתָחִים הָיוּ לְכָל אֶחָד וְאֶחָד מִן הַתָּאִים. אֶחָד לַתָּא מִן הַיָּמִין. וְאֶחָד לַתָּא מִן הַשְּׂמֹאל. וְאֶחָד לַתָּא שֶׁעַל גַּבָּיו. וּבְקֶרֶן מִזְרָחִית צְפוֹנִית בַּתָּא שֶׁבַּדְּיוֹטָא הָאֶמְצָעִית הָיוּ חֲמִשָּׁה פְּתָחִים. אֶחָד לַתָּא מִיָּמִין. וְאֶחָד לַתָּא שֶׁעַל גַּבָּיו. וְאֶחָד לַמְּסִבָּה. וְאֶחָד לַתָּא שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ הַפִּשְׁפָּשׁ. וְאֶחָד לַהֵיכָל:

Each cell had three entrances: one to the cell on the right, another to the cell on the left, 4:7. The Rambam's interpretation again differs from that of Rashi.Rashi would interpret right and left as lengthwise in the row of cells. According to the Rambam, the expressions right and left refer, as they have throughout the discussion of the Temple, to these directions as one faces the Holy of Holies, north and south respectively. and one to the cell above it.The cell in the northeast corner of the second storey had five entrances: one to the cell on its right, one to the cell above it, one to the winding stairwell, one towards the cell with the wicket, and one to the Temple.

וּמְסִבָּה הָיְתָה עוֹלָה מִקֶּרֶן מִזְרָחִית צְפוֹנִית לְקֶרֶן צְפוֹנִית מַעֲרָבִית שֶׁבָּהּ הָיוּ עוֹלִין לְגַגּוֹת הַתָּאִים. הָיָה עוֹלֶה בַּמְּסִבָּה וּפָנָיו לַמַּעֲרָב הָלַךְ אֶת כָּל פְּנֵי הַצָּפוֹן עַד שֶׁהוּא מַגִּיעַ לַמַּעֲרָב. הִגִּיעַ לַמַּעֲרָב הָפַךְ פָּנָיו לַדָּרוֹם הָלַךְ אֶת כָּל פְּנֵי הַמַּעֲרָב עַד שֶׁהוּא מַגִּיעַ לַדָּרוֹם. הִגִּיעַ לַדָּרוֹם הָפַךְ פָּנָיו לַמִּזְרָח וְהָיָה מְהַלֵּךְ לַדָּרוֹם עַד שֶׁהוּא מַגִּיעַ לְפִתְחָהּ שֶׁל עֲלִיָּה שֶׁפִּתְחָהּ שֶׁל עֲלִיָּה הָיָה פָּתוּחַ לַדָּרוֹם:

The winding stairwell with which one would ascend to the roofs of the cells began its rise from the northeast corner towards the northwest corner [of the Temple]. One ascended on the winding stairwell facing the west and traversed the entire length of [the Temple's] northern side until reaching the west.When he reached the west, he would turn towards the south. He walked across the entire length of the western side until he reached the south. When he reached the south, he turned to the east. He walked eastward until reaching the entrance to the Temple's upper storey, since the entrance to the upper storey was on the south.

וּבְפִתְחָהּ שֶׁל עֲלִיָּה הָיוּ שְׁתֵּי כְּלוּנְסוֹת שֶׁל אֶרֶז שֶׁבָּהֶן עוֹלִין לְגַגָּהּ שֶׁל עֲלִיָּה. וְרָאשֵׁי פִּסְפְּסִין הָיוּ מַבְדִּילִין בַּעֲלִיָּה בֵּין גַּג הַקֹּדֶשׁ לְגַג קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים. וְלוּלִין הָיוּ פְּתוּחִין בָּעֲלִיָּה לְבֵית קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים שֶׁבָּהֶן מְשַׁלְשְׁלִין אֶת הָאֻמָּנִין בְּתֵבוֹת כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יָזוּנוּ עֵינֵיהֶם מִבֵּית קֹדֶשׁ הַקָּדָשִׁים. וּפַעַם אַחַת בְּשָׁנָה מִפֶּסַח לְפֶסַח מְלַבְּנִין אֶת הַהֵיכָל:

At the entrance to the Temple's upper storey, there were two cedar beams upon which one could climb to the roof of the upper storey. Marking posts in the upper storey differentiated between the roof of the Sanctuary and the roof of the Holy of Holies. 4:5), explicitly states that they were placed on the floor of the top level.In addition to these marking posts, two curtains were hung in the upper storey, resembling the curtains which divided the Sanctuary from the Holy of Holies (Hilchot K'lei HaMikdash 7:17).Apertures in the upper storey [led to] the Holy of Holies, through which craftsmen). would be lowered in boxes, writes that the boxes were closed on three sides and open on the fourth. so that they would not satiate their eyes [gazing at] the chamber of the Holy of Holies. 26a states that one is not required to bring a guilt offering for deriving pleasure by gazing at sacred objects. However, though no offering is required, it was still forbidden to gaze at the Holy of Holies.Once a year, from Passover to Passover, they coated the Temple building with cement. 3:4. However, it is difficult to understand which part of the Temple building was to be covered with cement. As explained in Chapter 1, Halachah 14, the exterior of the Temple building was made of fine marble, and at times, it was coated with gold. Surely, these attractive surfaces would not be covered with simple cement.There are sources who suggest that it was the Temple ceiling that was coated with cement each year. It is our prayer that the Temple will be rebuilt in the near future and then, we will understand the Rambam's intent.